Rule 2.

Rule 2. Attendance at

Hearings and Privacy

(Amended effective for guardians ad litem appointed in Minnesota’s juvenile and family courts after 12 o’clock midnight January 1, 2005.)

2.02 Exclusion of Persons Who Have a Right to Attend HearingsThe court may temporarily exclude any person, except counsel and the guardian ad litem appointed in the delinquency proceeding, when it is in the best interests of the child to do so. The court shall note on the record the reasons a person is excluded. Counsel for the person excluded has the right to remain and participate if the person excluded had the right to participate in the proceeding. An unrepresented child cannot be excluded on the grounds that it is in the best interests of the child to do so.

(Amended effective for all juvenile delinquency actions commenced or children taken into custody after 12 o’clock midnight January 1, 2007.)

(Amended effective for all juvenile delinquency actions commenced or children taken into custody after 12 o’clock midnight January 1, 2007.)

(Amended effective for guardians ad litem appointed in Minnesota’s juvenile and family courts after 12 o’clock midnight January 1, 2005.)

2.05 Ex Parte CommunicationsThe court shall not receive or consider any ex parte communication from anyone concerning a proceeding, including conditions of release, detention, evidence, adjudication, disposition, or any other matter. The court shall fully disclose to all counsel on the record any attempted ex parte communication.

2.06 Use of RestraintsSubdivision 1.Definition.As used in this rule, “restraints” means a mechanical or other device that constrains the movement of a person’s body or limbs.Subd. 2.When Restraints May be Used.Restraints may not be used on a child appearing in court in a proceeding under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 260B, unless the court finds that:(A) the use of restraints is necessary:(1) to prevent physical harm to the child or another; or(2) to prevent the child from fleeing in situations in which the child presents a substantial risk of flight from the courtroom; and(B) there are no less restrictive alternatives to restraints that will prevent flight or physical harm to the child or another, including but not limited to the presence of court personnel, law enforcement officers, or bailiffs.The finding in clause (A), paragraph (2), may be based, among other things, on the child having a history of disruptive courtroom behavior or behavior while in custody for any current or prior offense that has placed others in potentially harmful situations, or presenting a substantial risk of inflicting physical harm on the child or others as evidenced by past behavior. The court may take into account the physical structure of the courthouse in assessing the applicability of the above factors to the individual child.Subd. 3.Hearing Procedure and Order.The court shall be provided the child’s behavior history and shall provide the child an opportunity to be heard in person or through counsel before ordering the use of restraints. If restraints are ordered, the court shall make findings of fact in support of the order.

*(Added effective July 1, 2024.)*Comment–Rule 2Minn. R. Juv. Del. P. 2.01 allows persons authorized by statute to attend juvenile court proceedings. They include the public, in cases where a juvenile over age 16 is alleged to have committed a felony, and victims. The public is also entitled to be present during a juvenile certification hearing where a juvenile over age 16 is alleged to have committed a felony, except that the court may exclude the public from portions of a certification hearing to discuss psychological material or other evidence that would not be accessible to the public in an adult proceeding. Minnesota Statutes 2002, section 260B.163, subdivision 1, paragraph (c). The statute does not currently permit exclusion when similar material is being presented in an extended jurisdiction juvenile proceeding. This may simply be an oversight. See also Minnesota Statutes 1994, section 609.115, subdivision 6.Minn. R. Juv. Del. P. 2.02 permits exclusion of persons from hearings, even when they have a right to participate, to serve the child’s best interests. For example, sometimes expert opinions are offered to the court regarding a child’s psychological profile or amenability to probation supervision. Counsel are usually aware of such opinions and if it serves no useful purpose or may even be detrimental to a child’s best interests to hear these opinions, it may be appropriate to temporarily exclude the child from the hearing. Obviously, this should be brought to the court’s attention either before the hearing or at a bench conference. Because a child charged with a juvenile petty or juvenile traffic offense does not have a right to appointment of counsel at public expense, that child cannot be excluded unless the child is represented by counsel.Minn. R. Juv. Del. P. 2.03 subd 2 provides that the prosecuting attorney shall be present or available for all hearings unless excused by the court in its discretion. On occasion, because of time constraints and distance, it may be impossible for the prosecuting attorney to be present in person at a particular hearing. So long as the prosecuting attorney is available by telephone conference, the hearing could proceed without the prosecutor actually being present.Minn. R. Juv. Del. P. 2.05 requires full disclosure by the court to all counsel on the record of any attempted ex parte communication. Juvenile court has historically been less formal and more casual than other court proceedings. As a result, lawyers, probation and court services personnel, law enforcement, victims, and relatives of the child have sometimes attempted and succeeded in having ex parte contact with the juvenile court judge. As the sanctions for delinquency become more severe, due process safeguards become more imperative.Minn. R. Juv. Del. P. 2.06 is derived from Minnesota Statutes, section 260B.008 (2022).

Source: Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes