2025 Session Last amended: 2011 session

§ 302A.751 — Judicial Intervention; Equitable Remedies or Dissolution

Plain-Language Summary

This section allows a court to grant equitable remedies or dissolve a Minnesota corporation when serious problems arise, such as director deadlock, fraud, illegal conduct, unfairly prejudicial treatment of shareholders, waste of corporate assets, or a creditor's inability to collect a judgment.

Practical Notes
When this applies: When shareholders face deadlock, oppression, fraud, or other serious corporate governance disputes that cannot be resolved internally. Who this affects: Shareholders, directors, creditors, and the attorney general. Key points: This is one of the most important remedies for minority shareholders in closely held corporations. A court can order any equitable relief it considers just, not only dissolution. In a buy-out proceeding, the court determines the fair value of a shareholder’s shares. The ‘unfairly prejudicial’ standard (for non-public corporations) is broader than fraud or illegality, covering conduct that frustrates the reasonable expectations of shareholders. Venue is in the county of the corporation’s registered office.