2025 Session Last amended: 2025 session

§ 325D.44 — Deceptive Trade Practices

Plain-Language Summary

This section defines the acts that constitute deceptive trade practices in Minnesota, listing 14 specific practices such as passing off goods as another's, false advertising, bait-and-switch tactics, and misrepresenting the source, quality, or characteristics of goods or services. It also makes it a deceptive trade practice to advertise, display, or offer a price that does not include all mandatory fees or surcharges, with detailed compliance rules and exemptions. To prevail in an action under sections 325D.43 to 325D.48, a complainant need not prove competition between the parties or actual confusion or misunderstanding.

Practical Notes
When this applies: When a business engages in misleading or deceptive conduct in the course of business, vocation, or occupation, or advertises a price that omits mandatory fees or surcharges. Who this affects: Businesses, consumers, and competitors. Key points: The statute lists 14 specific deceptive practices, including passing off goods as another’s, causing confusion about source or sponsorship, false geographic origin claims, misrepresenting characteristics of goods, selling used goods as new, false advertising, and disparaging competitors with false statements. A separate provision (subdivision 1a) prohibits advertising or offering a price that does not include all mandatory fees or surcharges and sets out compliance rules for delivery platforms, auctions, food and beverage establishments, and others, with exemptions for certain motor vehicle, utility, and real estate settlement fees. To prevail in an action under sections 325D.43 to 325D.48, a complainant need not prove competition between the parties or actual confusion or misunderstanding. The injunctive remedy itself is provided by section 325D.45. This is a broad consumer and competitor protection statute often paired with section 8.31 (private attorney general) for damages claims.