2025 Session Last amended: 2025 session

§ 325D.44 — Deceptive Trade Practices

Plain-Language Summary

This section defines 13 specific acts that constitute deceptive trade practices in Minnesota, including passing off goods as another's, false advertising, bait-and-switch tactics, and misrepresenting the source, quality, or characteristics of goods or services. Persons harmed by deceptive trade practices may seek injunctive relief.

Practical Notes
When this applies: When a business engages in misleading or deceptive conduct in the course of business, vocation, or occupation. Who this affects: Businesses, consumers, and competitors. Key points: The statute lists 13 specific deceptive practices, including: passing off goods as another’s, causing confusion about source or sponsorship, false geographic origin claims, misrepresenting characteristics of goods, selling used goods as new, false advertising, bait-and-switch tactics, and disparaging competitors with false statements. A person likely to be damaged may seek an injunction without proving actual damages or the defendant’s intent. This is a broad consumer and competitor protection statute often paired with section 8.31 (private attorney general) for damages claims.